Tweak

InsaneJournal

Tweak says, "try to take over the world!"

Username: 
Password:    
Remember Me
  • Create Account
  • IJ Login
  • OpenID Login
Search by : 
  • View
    • Create Account
    • IJ Login
    • OpenID Login
  • Journal
    • Post
    • Edit Entries
    • Customize Journal
    • Comment Settings
    • Recent Comments
    • Manage Tags
  • Account
    • Manage Account
    • Viewing Options
    • Manage Profile
    • Manage Notifications
    • Manage Pictures
    • Manage Schools
    • Account Status
  • Friends
    • Edit Friends
    • Edit Custom Groups
    • Friends Filter
    • Nudge Friends
    • Invite
    • Create RSS Feed
  • Asylums
    • Post
    • Asylum Invitations
    • Manage Asylums
    • Create Asylum
  • Site
    • Support
    • Upgrade Account
    • FAQs
    • Search By Location
    • Search By Interest
    • Search Randomly

barty ([info]squatter) wrote,
@ 2008-05-19 19:57:00

Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
{oo1.} On socks.
These journals seem rather droll. Just another window for the Ministry into our already thought-controlled lives. A waste of trees, time, and Galleons, as per usual Ministry-style.

Isn't it, then, ironic that I'm deigning to write in mine? I thought so myself. It just so happens that I found the thing at lying the bottom of my trunk whilst I was rooting about for matching socks. I'm merely curious as to its operations and am wanting to know just what these things can do. Ah, but why rationalise to you? As if what you think of my reasoning is pertinent or of worth.

However, I would like help in my sock decision: dark green & brown in a square pattern or navy?

It's the tough, important times like these that these journals come in handy. I'm simply torn.


(Post a new comment)


[info]typically_tala
2008-05-19 11:29 pm UTC (link)
The choice of your socks clearly rests in what you are wearing.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]squatter
2008-05-20 01:50 am UTC (link)
Clothing, of course. What did you expect? A leaf?

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)


[info]typically_tala
2008-05-20 10:09 am UTC (link)
Honestly! I was referring to the colours of the clothing you're wearing.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)


[info]squatter
2008-05-20 10:36 am UTC (link)
Let us be specific then. I am wearing my uniform, naturally enough.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)


[info]typically_tala
2008-05-20 06:30 pm UTC (link)
Then I would go with the navy.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)


[info]squatter
2008-05-20 07:55 pm UTC (link)
Seems the scales have been tipped. Navy it is.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)


[info]typically_tala
2008-05-20 08:01 pm UTC (link)
I'm glad I could assist in making your decision.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

(no subject) - [info]squatter, 2008-05-20 11:06 pm UTC

[info]hookm
2008-05-19 11:44 pm UTC (link)
You're cynical. And a little sarcastic.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]squatter
2008-05-20 01:51 am UTC (link)
You're just trying to flatter me, aren't you, Ms Hookum?

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)


[info]hookm
2008-05-20 01:52 am UTC (link)
See? Sarcasm. And why would I try to flatter you?

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)


[info]squatter
2008-05-20 01:57 am UTC (link)
Perhaps you fancy the colour of my eyes? You'd be better suited to ask yourself of your own motives, rather than questioning me, don't you agree?

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)


[info]hookm
2008-05-20 02:01 am UTC (link)
No one mentioned the colour of your eyes. I'd sooner eat bubotuber pus.

I believe you're the one out to flatter yourself.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)


[info]squatter
2008-05-20 02:03 am UTC (link)
Denial is adorable on you.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

(no subject) - [info]hookm, 2008-05-20 02:04 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]squatter, 2008-05-20 02:07 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]hookm, 2008-05-20 02:08 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]squatter, 2008-05-20 02:10 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]hookm, 2008-05-20 02:11 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]squatter, 2008-05-20 02:14 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]hookm, 2008-05-20 02:16 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]squatter, 2008-05-20 02:19 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]hookm, 2008-05-20 02:20 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]squatter, 2008-05-20 02:23 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]hookm, 2008-05-20 02:24 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]squatter, 2008-05-20 02:26 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]hookm, 2008-05-20 02:28 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]squatter, 2008-05-20 02:30 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]hookm, 2008-05-20 02:31 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]squatter, 2008-05-20 02:33 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]hookm, 2008-05-20 02:34 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]squatter, 2008-05-20 02:36 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]hookm, 2008-05-20 02:37 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]squatter, 2008-05-20 02:39 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]hookm, 2008-05-20 02:40 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]squatter, 2008-05-20 02:44 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]hookm, 2008-05-20 02:45 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]squatter, 2008-05-20 02:50 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]hookm, 2008-05-20 02:51 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]squatter, 2008-05-20 02:53 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]hookm, 2008-05-20 02:54 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]squatter, 2008-05-20 02:57 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]hookm, 2008-05-20 02:57 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]squatter, 2008-05-20 03:00 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]hookm, 2008-05-20 03:01 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]squatter, 2008-05-20 03:03 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]hookm, 2008-05-20 11:22 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]squatter, 2008-05-20 11:31 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]hookm, 2008-05-20 11:33 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]squatter, 2008-05-20 11:34 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]hookm, 2008-05-20 11:35 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]squatter, 2008-05-20 11:42 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]hookm, 2008-05-20 11:44 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]squatter, 2008-05-20 11:46 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]hookm, 2008-05-20 11:48 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]squatter, 2008-05-20 11:51 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]hookm, 2008-05-20 11:53 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]squatter, 2008-05-20 12:01 pm UTC

[info]alectric
2008-05-20 02:40 am UTC (link)
I like square pattern, Barty.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]squatter
2008-05-20 02:42 am UTC (link)
Thank you for the first bit of constructive advice, Alecto! I shall note your choice on my tally chart: 1 for the square pattern and 0 for the navy.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)


[info]alectric
2008-05-20 02:44 am UTC (link)
You are so silly.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)


[info]squatter
2008-05-20 02:47 am UTC (link)
I don't believe in frivolity. I am a very serious man, you know.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)


[info]alectric
2008-05-20 02:48 am UTC (link)
That is not true. You are certainly the complete opposite of serious.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)


[info]squatter
2008-05-20 02:51 am UTC (link)
You must have the wrong Bartemius Crouch, Jr., Ms Carrow.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

(no subject) - [info]alectric, 2008-05-20 02:52 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]squatter, 2008-05-20 02:54 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]alectric, 2008-05-20 03:03 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]squatter, 2008-05-20 03:04 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]alectric, 2008-05-20 03:05 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]squatter, 2008-05-20 03:06 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]alectric, 2008-05-20 03:07 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]squatter, 2008-05-20 03:09 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]alectric, 2008-05-20 03:10 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]squatter, 2008-05-20 03:12 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]alectric, 2008-05-20 03:14 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]squatter, 2008-05-20 03:15 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]alectric, 2008-05-20 03:16 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]squatter, 2008-05-20 03:20 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]alectric, 2008-05-20 03:21 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]squatter, 2008-05-20 10:35 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]alectric, 2008-05-20 11:34 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]squatter, 2008-05-20 11:43 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]alectric, 2008-05-20 11:45 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]squatter, 2008-05-20 11:47 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]alectric, 2008-05-20 11:48 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]squatter, 2008-05-20 11:50 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]alectric, 2008-05-20 11:52 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]squatter, 2008-05-20 11:59 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]alectric, 2008-05-20 02:57 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]squatter, 2008-05-20 03:24 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]alectric, 2008-05-20 03:27 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]squatter, 2008-05-20 07:55 pm UTC

[info]amoralknowledge
2008-05-20 12:16 pm UTC (link)
Navy. It matches better with the Ravenclaw colors.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]squatter
2008-05-20 12:27 pm UTC (link)
Oh dear. Now I have conflicting advice!

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)


[info]amoralknowledge
2008-05-20 12:44 pm UTC (link)
Perhaps others will weigh in on the subject. Ultimately, though, you should wear the pair that's more comfortable.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)


[info]squatter
2008-05-20 12:48 pm UTC (link)
Invaluable words, Boudicca. Thank you.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]gonna_rocknroll
2008-05-20 02:21 pm UTC (link)
Your socks sound boring.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]squatter
2008-05-20 03:23 pm UTC (link)
Unfortunately, as a person with an IQ above 100, I am unable to not be boring. It's sad, really. I am condemned to forever having boring socks. May I live vicariously through you?

(Reply to this) (Parent)



Home | Site Map | Manage Account | TOS | Privacy | Support | FAQs